<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Media Psychology Matters&#187; Entrepreneurship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pamelarutledge.com/category/entrepreneurship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pamelarutledge.com</link>
	<description>Dr. Pamela  Rutledge on the psychology of media and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:37:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Advice from Drucker for Facebook: Organizing for Change</title>
		<link>http://www.pamelarutledge.com/2009/10/19/advice-from-drucker-for-facebook-organizing-for-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pamelarutledge.com/2009/10/19/advice-from-drucker-for-facebook-organizing-for-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Rutledge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brands & Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demise of Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drucker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pamelarutledge.com/?p=490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a story about the demise of Facebook in the Washington Post: Worldwide ebb for Facebook. I like the logic&#8211;when a company&#8217;s been around long enough for someone to make a movie out of it, then it&#8217;s probably on the downhill slide, even if they do get Justin Timberlake. That people are interested in something [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style='float: left; margin-right: 10px; border: none;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=872e03cb968095d2412db08701e02826&amp;default=http://use.perl.org/images/pix.gif' alt='No Gravatar' width=50 height=50/><p>There&#8217;s a story about the demise of Facebook in the Washington Post:<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/18/AR2009101802327.html?wpisrc%3Dnewsletter%26wphttp://www.washingthttp://www.washingtonpost.com:80/ac2/wp-dyn?node=admin/registration/register&amp;sub=AR" target="_blank"> Worldwide ebb for Facebook. </a> I like the logic&#8211;when a company&#8217;s been around long enough for someone to make a movie out of it, then it&#8217;s probably on the downhill slide, even if they do get Justin Timberlake.</p>
<p>That people are interested in something new shouldn&#8217;t be surprising to anyone in business, marketing or evolutionary psychology.  Same ol&#8217;, same ol&#8217; won&#8217;t cut it, especially in a world where expectations about the speed of change have reached new highs.  But rather than speculate on trends and following the migration across social media tools of whoever&#8217;s cool, it&#8217;s time to revisit some words of wisdom from the original management guru, Peter Drucker.</p>
<p>Organizations must be organized for innovation.  Using economist Joseph Schumpeter&#8217;s term &#8220;creative destruction,&#8221;  Drucker said companies should be:</p>
<blockquote><p>..organized for the systematic abandonment of whatever is established, customary, family and comfortable, whether that is a product, service, or process; a set of skills; human and social relationships; or the organization itself.  In short, itmust be organized for constant change.  The organization&#8217;s function is to put knowledge to work&#8211;on tools, products, and processes; on the design of work; on knowledge itself.  it is the nature of knowledge that it changes fast and that today&#8217;s certainties always become tomorrow&#8217;s absurdities.&#8221; (Drucker, 2006, p. 140)</p></blockquote>
<p>Just because companies like Facebook, Twitter, and all the rest are using new technologies and breaking new ground, doesn&#8217;t mean they aren&#8217;t subject to the same needs for good management practices that cultivate innovation.  It will be up to Facebook&#8217;s management, not a few trendsetters, if Facebook is to stay prosperous and viable.<br />
&#8212;<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1422101681?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=rutledgeinsti-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=1422101681">Drucker, P. (2006) Classic Drucker: Wisdom from Peter Drucker from the Pages of Harvard Business Review. Cambridge, Harvard Business Press.</a><img style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=rutledgeinsti-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1422101681" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=18e99a3b-22c9-831f-a9cf-4944ca1abeaa" alt="" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pamelarutledge.com/2009/10/19/advice-from-drucker-for-facebook-organizing-for-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

